Tuesday, October 03, 2006
Week 5
First off, David Lewin showed up over the weekend in Football Outsiders mailbag
He had this to say about the QB projection system: The research tells us that scouts rarely miss on guys with high games started, the only exceptions being cases where they do not properly consider the importance of completion percentage (Cade McNown). Quinn will probably finish his career with a completion rate of about 59 percent. Typically quarterbacks above 58 or 59 percent are underrated by scouts, those with completion percentages below this threshold are over-rated, and those with completion percentages right at it are usually rated correctly.
And:...college system effects are one thing that the projection formula does not handle well (Tim Couch being Exhibit A). The only way the system accounts for college system effects is that teams try not to draft guys who are just products of their college system. Remember, the projection system only applies to first- and second-round picks.
With that in mind, let's look at the BMOC:
Beck was back this week as the Cougars snapped TCU's 13 game winning streak.
Brohm is still out for a bit; probably another month or so.
I didn't realize that the "l" in Kolb was silent.
His numbers look good, but I don't know enough about college football to tell if that's an Urban Meyer effect or not. He went from 59.4 and 59.7 as an underclassman to 62.8 and 64.6 the last two years.
Russell and Leak face off this Saturday at 3:30.
He had this to say about the QB projection system: The research tells us that scouts rarely miss on guys with high games started, the only exceptions being cases where they do not properly consider the importance of completion percentage (Cade McNown). Quinn will probably finish his career with a completion rate of about 59 percent. Typically quarterbacks above 58 or 59 percent are underrated by scouts, those with completion percentages below this threshold are over-rated, and those with completion percentages right at it are usually rated correctly.
And:...college system effects are one thing that the projection formula does not handle well (Tim Couch being Exhibit A). The only way the system accounts for college system effects is that teams try not to draft guys who are just products of their college system. Remember, the projection system only applies to first- and second-round picks.
With that in mind, let's look at the BMOC:
Date | Name | Team | GS | Att | Comp | Pct |
28-Sep | John | Beck | BYU | 1 | 37 | 23 | 62.16 |
2006 | John | Beck | BYU | 4 | 154 | 105 | 68.18 |
Total | John | Beck | 30 | 1155 | 701 | 60.69 |
Beck was back this week as the Cougars snapped TCU's 13 game winning streak.
2006 | Brian | Brohm | Loui | 3 | 74 | 45 | 60.81 |
Total | Brian | Brohm | 11 | 473 | 318 | 67.23 |
Brohm is still out for a bit; probably another month or so.
30-Sep | Kevin | Kolb | Hou | 1 | 28 | 18 | 64.29 |
2006 | Kevin | Kolb | Hou | 5 | 164 | 112 | 68.29 |
Total | Kevin | Kolb | 41 | 1296 | 783 | 60.42 |
I didn't realize that the "l" in Kolb was silent.
30-Sep | Chris | Leak | Fla | 1 | 20 | 14 | 70.00 |
2006 | Chris | Leak | Fla | 5 | 130 | 84 | 64.62 |
Total | Chris | Leak | 38 | 1223 | 747 | 61.08 |
His numbers look good, but I don't know enough about college football to tell if that's an Urban Meyer effect or not. He went from 59.4 and 59.7 as an underclassman to 62.8 and 64.6 the last two years.
30-Sep | Jordan | Palmer | UTEP | 1 | 26 | 18 | 69.23 |
2006 | Jordan | Palmer | UTEP | 4 | 141 | 96 | 68.09 |
Total | Jordan | Palmer | 34 | 1139 | 665 | 58.38 |
30-Sep | Brady | Quinn | ND | 1 | 38 | 29 | 76.32 |
2006 | Brady | Quinn | ND | 5 | 196 | 121 | 61.73 |
Total | Brady | Quinn | 38 | 1331 | 761 | 57.18 |
30-Sep | JaMarcus | Russell | LSU | 1 | 20 | 18 | 90.00 |
2006 | JaMarcus | Russell | LSU | 5 | 115 | 81 | 70.43 |
Total | JaMarcus | Russell | 21 | 570 | 342 | 60.00 |
30-Sep | Troy | Smith | OHSt | 1 | 25 | 16 | 64.00 |
2006 | Troy | Smith | OHSt | 5 | 129 | 84 | 65.12 |
Total | Troy | Smith | 20 | 488 | 301 | 61.68 |
30-Sep | Drew | Stanton | MISt | 1 | 24 | 15 | 62.50 |
2006 | Drew | Stanton | MISt | 5 | 127 | 79 | 62.20 |
Total | Drew | Stanton | 23 | 705 | 458 | 64.96 |
Russell and Leak face off this Saturday at 3:30.
Comments:
<< Home
His numbers look good, but I don't know enough about college football to tell if that's an Urban Meyer effect or not.
Excellent point. Maybe that would explain Alex Smith (but it's still probably too early to say for sure). Leak's number weren't that bad his first 2 years (again, consider his poor system in the first place).
I guess that would mean our boy Quinn should be ok. I just don't like the way he looks at times, but I know that's partly cause I can't get against my anti-ND bias.
Excellent point. Maybe that would explain Alex Smith (but it's still probably too early to say for sure). Leak's number weren't that bad his first 2 years (again, consider his poor system in the first place).
I guess that would mean our boy Quinn should be ok. I just don't like the way he looks at times, but I know that's partly cause I can't get against my anti-ND bias.
This is interesting, GGC. Are any of these guys beneficiaries of changed systems during the time they've been at their college? JaMarcus Russell's numbers this year are amazing.
Unlimited Earnings Potential - http://1greatfuture.com
Our company is rapidly growing and offers you an extraordinary income helping others succeed. The primary requirement is to follow up on client inquiries and point them in the right direction. It is stress free, rewarding and straightforward work.
For complete details: http://1greatfuture.com
(Please feel free to delete this post if you don't want it on your blog. Thanks for the informative blog and opportunity to post.)
Post a Comment
Our company is rapidly growing and offers you an extraordinary income helping others succeed. The primary requirement is to follow up on client inquiries and point them in the right direction. It is stress free, rewarding and straightforward work.
For complete details: http://1greatfuture.com
(Please feel free to delete this post if you don't want it on your blog. Thanks for the informative blog and opportunity to post.)
<< Home